Should You Take Medicine for Treating Enlarged Prostate?

As a man ages, his prostate may become larger, a disorder known as Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH). While an enlarged prostate is neither a serious nor a life-threatening condition, it can cause urinating problems in men aged 50 years and older. Men with urinary problems should immediately see their doctor for a prompt and accurate diagnosis because symptoms of BPH are similar to those of prostate cancer. A patient should also see a doctor immediately when experiencing fever, chills, back pain, side pain, abdominal pain, bloody or cloudy urine, or pain when urinating.

Treatment of Enlarged Prostate

After a diagnosis of prostate enlargement, the urologist evaluates the severity of symptoms before recommending treatment. You are expected to participate in the decision making process to ensure you get the best treatment possible. Generally, no medications are prescribed for enlarged prostate unless the symptoms are severe, bothersome or accompanied by problems such as bladder stones or bladder infection. In fact, around 4 out of 10 men usually have no symptoms or have their symptoms improve without medications or surgery and only require lifestyle changes to manage BPH. Conversely, 1 in 4 men in their late 50s, 1 in 3 men in their late 60s, and 1 in 2 men in their late 70s and beyond can expect to have bothersome symptoms that require medications or even surgery.

Watchful Waiting

Should you take medications for treating enlarged prostate? After the diagnosis of BPH, you will have to choose either watchful waiting or medicine as your primary treatment, though surgery is sometimes necessary for serious symptoms. The best treatment option for men with minimal and less bothersome symptoms is watchful waiting. It involves combining lifestyle measures that prevent or relieve symptoms of BPH with visits to the urologist at least once a year for physical examination, testing and symptom status review.

Men managing BPH through watchful waiting must limit the amount of fluid they consume at any given time, avoid drinking fluids after 7 p.m., avoid beverages containing caffeine, avoid delaying urination, cut back on salty or spicy foods, limit alcohol intake, engage in regular physical activity and Kegel exercises, avoid cold weather and keep themselves warm, control their weight, control their blood sugar level, eat diets rich in vegetables, and avoid over-the-counter antihistamines (decongestants).

You should opt for watchful waiting if:

  • (a) You experience mild and less bothersome BPH symptoms.
  • (b) The side effects of the medicine may bother you more than the mild symptoms of BPH.
  • (c) You can attend regular medical checkups (at least once a year).
  • (d) You can effectively use special bathroom techniques, cut back on your fluid intake and change your lifestyle.

Medicines

If your symptoms are severe or worsen during watchful waiting, you should consider taking BPH medications. The three types of drugs commonly used for treating enlarged prostate are alpha-blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Alpha-blockers are fast-acting drugs that relax prostate muscles and relieve urination problems within a few days or weeks. They include terazosin (Hytrin), doxazosin (Cardura), prazosin (Minipress), silodosin (Rapaflo), Alfuzosin (UroXatral) and tamsulosin (Flomax). Drugs called 5-alpha reductase inhibitors such as dutasteride (Avodart) and finasteride (Proscar) cause shrinkage of the prostate and improve symptoms, albeit after several months. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor called tadalafil (Cialis for daily use) has also been approved for use in treating BPH.

When using a prescription for managing enlarged prostate, you will take the pills every day for life, have regular medical checkups, and use special bathroom techniques such as relaxation and double voiding. The medicines will reduce the risk of urinary retention, relieve symptoms and minimize risks of future surgery. However, prescriptions are often expensive and come with certain side effects such as trouble getting an erection, diminished sex drive, tiredness, dizziness, and stuffy nose.

Conclusion

When you have problems urinating, you should immediately see a doctor as you may have an enlarged prostate. At the urology clinic, the doctor will perform a physical exam and run a few tests to find out if you have BPH. If BPH is confirmed, the urologist will explain to you the treatment options available, such as watchful waiting, medications and or surgery for serious cases. The treatment option chosen will depend on the severity of symptoms and your desire to improve the quality of your life. You should consider watchful waiting if you have mild symptoms and want to avoid the adverse effects of drugs. However, in case of severe BPH symptoms, you should take medications to relieve symptoms and possibly prevent the need for surgery in the future. For more information on treating an enlarged prostate, visit St Pete Urology in St Petersburg, Florida.

Low Testosterone Treatment: Potential Benefits and Risks

Testosterone hormone therapy comes in three different forms; intramuscular injection, patch, or gel form. The injection is usually administered once a week, the patch and gel are both placed on the skin as directed by the doctor [Read Full Article…]

Urology Patient Testimonial

Dr. Graves is the kindest, most thoughtful, genuinely caring doctor I have ever encountered in my entire life; and my brother had cancer when we were three and mom had a triple by-pass at twelve. I grew up in hospitals, but I have not spent much time in them for myself since very recently. I would rather pass a stone at home-and have twice- than have the kidney stone blasted at the hospital because of the pain afterward from endometriosis. Dr Graves called me HIMSELF to check on me. Choose him. – Kendra Burke

[Read Review…]

Are certain foods helpful in addressing erectile dysfunction (ED)?

It’s possible. Research published in January 2016 found that men who ate foods high in antioxidants called flavonoids had a lower risk of erectile dysfunction (ED) than those who didn’t eat a flavonoid-rich diet.

Flavonoids can be found in certain plant-based foods like citrus fruits, blueberries, strawberries, apples, pears, cherries, blackberries, radishes, and blackcurrant. Some teas, herbs, and wines also have flavonoids in them.

Past studies have shown that consuming flavonoids could reduce a person’s risk for diabetes and heart disease, both of which can lead to ED.

Eating a healthy diet overall, particularly a Mediterranean diet, can go a long way in preserving erectile function, however.

This type of diet includes fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and olive oil. Nuts and fish are good additions.

What does diet have to do with erections?

When a man is sexually-aroused, his penis fills with blood, giving it the firmness it needs for sex. Many men with ED have poor blood flow to the penis. Some medical conditions, like diabetes and heart disease, can damage blood vessels and nerves that are critical for this process.

Eating a healthy diet keeps the body in good working order. It can help men maintain a healthy weight, keep their blood sugar under control, and reduce the risk of blood vessel damage, which can impair blood flow.

Diet isn’t the only path to good erections, however. Other lifestyle habits, like regular exercise, quitting smoking, and managing depression are important too.

A man’s doctor can help him decide which dietary changes to make. However, men who are having trouble with erections should be sure to mention it. Many factors can contribute to ED and it’s best to have a complete medical checkup. [Read Full Article…]

The Prostate Cancer Test That Saved My Life

“So, yeah, it’s cancer.”My urologist segued from talking about how inconvenient it was picking his daughter up at school that morning to dropping a cancer diagnosis on me without missing a beat. Two weeks earlier, I didn’t even have an urologist.

“Yeah,” he said, in a slightly nonplussed way, gazing at the results, “I was surprised myself.”

As my new, world-altering doctor spoke about cell cores and Gleason scores, probabilities of survival, incontinence and impotence, why surgery would be good and what kind would make the most sense, his voice literally faded out like every movie or TV show about a guy being told he had cancer… a classic Walter White moment, except I was me, and no one was filming anything at all.

I got diagnosed with prostate cancer Friday, June 13th, 2014. On September 17th of that year I got a test back telling me I was cancer free. The three months in between were a crazy roller coaster ride with which about 180,000 men a year in America can identify.

Right after I got the news, still trying to process the key words echoing dimly in my head (probability of survival–vival-vival-val…” “incontinence-nence-nence-ence …), I promptly got on my computer and Googled “Men who had prostate cancer.” I had no idea what to do and needed to see some proof this was not the end of the world.
John Kerry… Joe Torre… excellent, both still going strong. Mandy Patinkin… Robert DeNiro. They’re vital. OK great. Feeling relatively optimistic, I then of course had to do one more search, going dark and quickly tapping in “died of” in place of “had” in the search window.

As I learned more about my disease (one of the key learnings is not to Google “people who died of prostate cancer” immediately after being diagnosed with prostate cancer), I was able to wrap my head around the fact that I was incredibly fortunate. Fortunate because my cancer was detected early enough to treat. And also because my internist gave me a test he didn’t have to.

Taking the PSA test saved my life. Literally. That’s why I am writing this now. There has been a lot of controversy over the test in the last few years. Articles and op-eds on whether it is safe, studies that seem to be interpreted in many different ways, and debates about whether men should take it all. I am not offering a scientific point of view here, just a personal one, based on my experience. The bottom line for me: I was lucky enough to have a doctor who gave me what they call a “baseline” PSA test when I was about 46. I have no history of prostate cancer in my family and I am not in the high-risk group, being neither — to the best of my knowledge — of African or Scandinavian ancestry. I had no symptoms.

What I had — and I’m healthy today because of it — was a thoughtful internist who felt like I was around the age to start checking my PSA level, and discussed it with me.

If he had waited, as the American Cancer Society recommends, until I was 50, I would not have known I had a growing tumor until two years after I got treated. If he had followed the US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines, I would have never gotten tested at all, and not have known I had cancer until it was way too late to treat successfully.

Now, in my case, my doctor, Bernard Kruger, watched my PSA tests rise for over a year and a half, testing me every six months. As the numbers continued to rise, he sent me to the urologist, who gave me a slightly invasive physical check in his office using a gloved finger. This took all of 10 seconds. While I don’t recommend it for fun, amazingly some don’t recommend it at all. After this exam, and looking at my rising PSA numbers, he suggested an MRI to get a roadmap of my prostate.
It’s a non-invasive procedure like the one athletes get to check for torn ACLs. Loud, but painless. Only after studying the MRI results did my doctor recommend a not-fun-at-all biopsy. Unlike the MRI, the biopsy was as invasive as it gets: long needles in sensitive places and more small talk about kids and school pick ups while it was all going down.

Then the biopsy came back positive. Of course “positive” for medical tests is usually not so positive. I had a Gleason score of 7 (3+4), which is categorized “mid-range aggressive cancer.” Surgery was recommended. At this point I decided to go out and get a few different opinions. All the doctors I talked to concurred that the tumor needed to be taken out.

Ultimately, I found a wonderful surgeon named Edward Schaeffer who I felt comfortable with. He performed a robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Due to a lot of skill and a little beneficence from some higher power, he got all the cancer. As of this writing I am two years cancer free and extremely grateful.
So. What is the deal with this PSA test and why the controversy?

It is a simple, painless blood test. It is not dangerous in itself in any way. If the PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) value is elevated in the blood, or levels rise sharply over time, it could indicate the presence of prostate cancer. It is definitely not foolproof.

The criticism of the test is that depending on how they interpret the data, doctors can send patients for further tests like the MRI and the more invasive biopsy, when not needed. Physicians can find low-risk cancers that are not life threatening, especially to older patients. In some cases, men with this type of cancer get “over-treatment” like radiation or surgery, resulting in side effects such as impotence or incontinence. Obviously this is not good; however it’s all in the purview of the doctor treating the patient.

But without this PSA test itself, or any screening procedure at all, how are doctors going to detect asymptomatic cases like mine, before the cancer has spread and metastasized throughout one’s body rendering it incurable? Or what about the men who are most at risk, those of African ancestry, and men who have a history of prostate cancer in their family? Should we, as the USPSTF suggests, not screen them at all? There is growing evidence that these guidelines have led to increased cases of prostate cancers that get detected too late for the patient to survive the disease.

Five years after their initial recommendation to stop PSA testing, the USPSTF is presently, per their website, “updating their recommendations.” I think men over the age of 40 should have the opportunity to discuss the test with their doctor and learn about it, so they can have the chance to be screened. After that an informed patient can make responsible choices as to how to proceed.

I count my blessings that I had a doctor who presented me with these options. After I chose to take the test, he directed me to doctors who worked at centers of excellence in this field to determine the next steps. This is a complicated issue, and an evolving one. But in this imperfect world, I believe the best way to determine a course of action for the most treatable, yet deadly cancer, is to detect it early.

What Everyone Should Know About Retrograde Ejaculation

Retrograde ejaculation happens when semen enters the urinary bladder during ejaculation instead of moving out through the urethra. It may be caused by diabetes (32% of men with diabetes mellitus have this condition), nerve problems, or surgery of the urethra or prostate. Some medications used for treating high blood pressure, mood disorders and benign prostate hyperplasia are also known to cause this problem.

Symptoms

  • Little or no semen is secreted during ejaculation, a condition referred to as a dry orgasm.
  • After an orgasm, the urine looks cloudy due to the presence of semen.
  • Infertility is common in men with this problem.

Tests to Detect Retrograde Ejaculation

First, the genitals are physically examined for any anatomical defects. Following an exam, a “urinalysis” lab test of a urine sample collected immediately after ejaculation indicates the amount of sperm in the urine.

Treatment Options

In most cases, the diagnosis is carried out by a urologist specializing in urinary tract disorders and male reproductive problems, and the treatment procedure varies depending on the cause of the condition. If retrograde ejaculation occurs as a side effect of medication, discontinuing that medication usually resolves the problem. In cases where retrograde ejaculation occurs as a result of spinal cord injury, genitourinary tract surgery, or nerve damage caused by diabetes mellitus, epinephrine-like drugs are known to help, but the condition may not be completely curable. Although surgery is available, it is rarely a primary treatment for this condition since the results are found to be inconsistent.

Prevention

Diabetic men with this ejaculatory disorder are advised to keep their blood sugar levels under control. Also, diabetics and men with reproductive disorders should avoid medication that is known to cause retrograde ejaculation. If you notice a trace of cloudiness in your urine, you should make an appointment with a urologist right away because the treatments for retrograde ejaculation are more effective when the condition is detected early.